Archive for the ‘First Amendment Articles’ Category

Modification Management could be a critical piece for corporations. Giant companies rely on it for anything that affects their production environment. However what is modification management the least bit? Change Management is the method that kicks in when a change is made to the assembly surroundings of a business. For the matter of this article we tend to can use an Data Technology related case to explain Modification Management.

Company “A” uses modification management to keep track of changes to its net servers. The amendment management method conjointly allows to tell all internal business units and departments of the upcoming amendment to the net servers and what elements of the business are suffering from this change. The change management process is started by the decision to update the internet servers with a more moderen version of the web application. The web site administrators, the QA department and also the developers have finished the ultimate testing of the new application update and now it is time to travel live.

The website administrator starts the method by writing down the purpose of the modification and what steps are needed to finish the task. He conjointly describes the impact to internal and external users and that departments of the business may be affected (example: external client service). The description of those tasks for the update are sometimes high level and not too detailed. The reason for this is often additional to tell the business concerning the change and not to list an exact a way to little by little guide.

Once the website administrator has finished the initial change management request form (electronic or hardcopy) it goes up one level to his direct manager and together with his approval the change management request is being distributed among departmental points of contact that are outlined in an earlier process. The various departments and business groups review the change management request to judge the impact to the department or group. If no impact is visible or if a potential impact is already addressed and lined within the modification request the department or cluster approves the modification management. If a doable impact isn’t addressed the cluster or department denies approval and ask for additional data or how the problem in question  can be addressed. Approval for the amendment request goes to “pending”.

Once all problems are addressed and figured out and each necessary approval has been submitted the modification management request awaits yet one more step – CTO (Chief Technology Officer) or CIO (Chief Info Officer) approval may be required. This process makes certain that a data of changes that affect the business is formed and that each cluster, every department and also the business management are aware of what’s going on.

Some critics see amendment management as a method that slows down the flexibility to act quick when needed. Others see it as assurance for continuing business success as department A might not understand how massive the impact of a proposed modification is to department B.

Freelance Writers has been writing articles online for nearly 2 years now. Not only does this author specialize in Change Management, you can also check out his latest website about:

Maytag Washer Dryers Which reviews and lists the best

Maytag Stackable Washer Dryers

Americans care nothing about freedom of speech and expression. They are clueless and untethered, criminally disconnected. And I’m being kind.

Official Lionel Website: http://www.lionelmedia.com
The Lebron Law Firm Website – http://www.lebronfirm.com
Lionel Nation podcasts on iTunes – http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/lionel-nation/id1015647476 Lionel Nation podcasts on audioBoom – http://audioboom.com/lionelmedia
Lionel Nation podcasts on Stitcher – http://www.stitcher.com/podcast/lionel-nation
Twitter – http://www.twitter.com/lionelmedia
Instagram – http://www.instagram.com/lionelmedia/
Email – lionel@lionelmedia.com
Lionel YouTube Channel – http://www.youtube.com/LionelY2K
Official Facebook Fan Page – http://www.facebook.com/lionelfanpage
The Lebron Law Firm Facebook Page – http://www.facebook.com/lebronfirm
The Lebron Law Firm Twitter – http://www.twitter.com/lebronfirm
Video Rating: / 5

This short video traces the evolution of Madison’s attitude towards the religious liberty guarantees of the First Amendment. Initially opposed to a Bill of Rights as both inappropriate and dangerous, Madison’s views changed as a result of political and philosophical considerations. Professor Jeffry Morrison emphasizes Madison’s belief that religion should play a vital but informal role in the life of the republic.

James Madison and the First Amendment by Jeffry Morrison, Ph.D., Academic Director of the James Madison Memorial Fellowship Foundation, Alexandria, Virginia.

American History Videos are sponsored by the James Madison Memorial Fellowship Foundation. These videos are offered to help teachers, students and the general public learn more about America’s founding and the Constitution of the United States. www.jamesmadison.gov.

Jeffrey Rosen of the National Constitution Center in conversation with Walter Isaacson of the Aspen Institute.
Video Rating: / 5

While the substance of constitutional rights is always important, it is often the procedures surrounding the protection and enforcement of those rights that give them teeth – or defang them. From the landmark case of New York Times v. Sullivan to the recently decided Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus, the procedures required before one can burden speech, or raise a successful defense under the First Amendment, are critical to the effective scope of the constitutional right. This panel will explore the various procedural safeguards applied – or not applied – in the context of the Freedom of Speech. What level of proof is required before speech may be restricted based on an otherwise valid interest? When will a private party have standing to challenge a restriction on speech that may not yet be final but that has immediate adverse consequences, such as requiring a party to defend an investigation or rebut a preliminary government finding in the midst of an election campaign? What safeguards should exist in administrative processes, such as IRS tax exemption rulings, where discretion may be used to punish speech or otherwise favor one viewpoint over another? These and other examples all illustrate that even where the substance of First Amendment rights is well established, procedural loopholes or protections can reduce or enhance the effectiveness of those rights.

The Federalist Society’s Free Speech & Election Law Practice Group presented this panel on “How First Amendment Procedures Protect First Amendment Substance” on Friday, November 14, during the 2014 National Lawyers Convention.

–Prof. Aaron H. Caplan, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles
–Prof. Robert A. Destro, The Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law
–Mr. Todd P. Graves, Graves Garrett LLC
–Prof. Alan B. Morrison, Lerner Family Associate Dean for Public Interest and Public Service Law; Professorial Lecturer in Law, The George Washington University Law School
–Prof. Eugene Volokh, Gary T. Schwartz Professor of Law, University of California, Los Angeles School of Law
–Moderator: Hon. David R. Stras, Associate Justice, Minnesota Supreme Court
–Introduction: Mr. Erik S. Jaffe, Sole Practitioner, Erik S. Jaffe, PC; and Chairman, Free Speech & Election Law Practice Group

Mayflower Hotel
Washington, DC
Video Rating: / 5

Discussion of the US Constitution

Florida horror school alumnus recalls bloody beatings after discovery of skeletal remains
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/students-skeletal-remains-uncovered-infamous-florida-school-boys-article-1.1448534
The Arthur G. Dozier School for Boys in Marianna gained a reputation for abuse, rape and even murder. Survivor Robert Straley told the Daily News, ‘I saw a boy whose skin was ripped right off from the small of his back to right by his buttocks. It looked like bloodied hamburger meat.’

Orlando Juvenile Justice Chief Demoted In Wake Of Complaints
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/1996-02-03/news/9602021797_1_bedson-juvenile-detention-center-juvenile-justice
His removal this week as manager of juvenile justice programs in Orange, Seminole, Osceola and Brevard counties follows intense criticism of substandard conditions at the Orlando Regional Juvenile Detention Center. The Orlando center houses young criminals from Orange and Osceola counties.
Video Rating: / 5