Archive for the ‘Peer Review Articles’ Category

These days a growing number of people are joining CEO peer groups in the hope of getting insight and expertise of other CEOs that can help them tackle crucial business and strategic management issues and make their organizations more successful and productive. However it is extremely important to join the right CEO group which will be suitable for your needs. A wrong CEO conference is a sheer waste of your precious time and money. Here are few tips to help you choose the right CEO group:

A CEO peer group must boast of varied expertise

Be a part of a CEO peer group in Atlanta or any other city which consists of CEOs from different industries with varied skills and strengths. For instance, joining a group which has CEOs from only manufacturing business will not be fruitful at all. On the other hand, a CEO conference which has an architect, a designer, CEO of a textile industry, someone with a MBA degree and others with varied expertise will promise better results.

Size of the CEO group

Select a CEO group which contains not more than 10 to 15 members. Any group containing more than 15 CEOs will never be able to yield results because more than half the time you will wait for your turn to be heard. Moreover steer clear of any CEO conference which doesn’t boast of a good attendance record of its CEO members. As a CEO group with a poor attendance record will never be able to built an atmosphere of trust and confidence where members can share their problems freely. In short, a CEO conference with 10 to 15 people is an ideal size.

An efficient facilitator

A facilitator or a co-ordinator plays a crucial role in meetings of CEO peer groups. In fact a large part of the success or failure of a CEO group depends upon the facilitator. A facilitator makes sure that each member in the group gets a chance to speak and share his/her problems. He encourages the quiet people to come out with their ideas and problems openly and prevents any CEO or participating member from monopolizing or dominating the conversation. Whether you join CEO peer groups in Atlanta or any other city, make sure you do your research about the facilitator before becoming a part of that group.

Confidentiality matters

Confidentiality is taken very seriously in a CEO peer group. Any breach of information will not be tolerated. After all various CEOs share their ideas, business plans, problems, exit planning strategies openly with other people. If some member is found guilty of passing on information, he or she can be removed from the CEO group.

No soliciting business

A CEO group is designed in a way to allow members to share their problems with other experienced people openly. A CEO conference is not a place to solicit business or refer someone. It is for those who seek practical solutions of their problems which they are unable to get in their own organization.

Before joining any CEO peer group, make sure you keep all these things in mind. A good CEO group can take your business to a new level whereas a bad one can spoil everything. So choose wisely.

Tom Bordon is a freelance writer who has extensively written about CEO peer groups in Atlanta and executive business coaching. His articles focus on guiding CEOs, COOs and top level executives in making new business plans, and exit planning strategies in a CEO conference or a CEO group.

Transcript:
This short video will give you tips on how to tell if a journal is peer reviewed. Some journals are peer-reviewed, meaning that experts in the field review the articles before they are published. Not all journals go through the peer-review process. There are three main ways to find out if a journal is peer reviewed. Number one, check the journal’s website. Simply google the name of the journal and find its official website. Once there look at the editorial statement or instructions to authors for references to the peer-review process. References to the process could include words like “Peer Review, Refereed, Reviewed, or Blind Review”. Number 2, limit your search to peer-reviewed sources only. Some periodical indexes or article databases allow you to limit your search to peer-reviewed sources simply by selecting a tab or checking a box on the search screen. Number 3, you can search for the journal name in Ulrich’s Global Serials Directory to determine if a journal is peer-reviewed. Simply type in the name of the journal, then check for the referee jersey symbol. This symbol indicates that the journal is peer-reviewed. You can also click on the journal title to see the full record. In the full record, there will be information on whether or not it is peer-reviewed. Helpful Hint: Even if a journal is peer-reviewed, an individual article in that journal may not be. Some article types, including book or articles reviews letters, editorials, or news items, may not have gone through the peer-review process. When in doubt, check with a library staff member, your professor, instructor or teaching assistant. This concludes this short video. Thank you for listening

In the 1993 Supreme Court case “Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals,” Justice Blackmun said for the unanimous court that an expert’s testimony has to rest on a reliable foundation and has to be relevant to the task at hand. He brought up the key consideration about whether the theory or technique used can be or has been tested and subjected to ‘peer review’ and publication.
Expert witnesses have seen their work rejected and their testimony excluded when they haven’t attended to Daubert standards of peer review.
Identify another specialist in your field that the court can treat as a peer. So if you are a biomedical engineer, another biomedical engineer would be a peer, and so on. Your attorney can retain this person to review your work, specifically your expert report. A peer reviewer would provide his own report of findings regarding the subject matter of your expert report. Yes, this may sound like double work, but an increasingly appropriate and valuable extra step. If another expert independently verifies the validity of your work, it will help to ensure the legal admissibility of that work. In addition, this extra step can bring extra credibility to your work. This will further support the relevancy and reliability of your work, opinion, and testimony.
The peer reviewer should submit his report directly to the law firm that engaged both of you. By and large, your attorney will submit your expert report, along with the peer reviewer’s report and a CV describing the peer reviewer’s background, training, and skills. You should not have any contact with the peer reviewer after the law firm retains him and before he submits his report back to them. Keep the points of this paragraph in mind because, from time to time, you may be hired in a case as a peer reviewer rather than as an expert witness.
Sometimes a peer review is called a third-party review, because the other party may not be a precise peer, but may still be a specialist in a related field of expertise. You should use such a third-party reviewer if part of your testimony includes information that is close to, but not specifically part of, your primary experience.

Judd Robbins has been an internationally recognized expert witness since 1986 in the US and in the UK. In 2010, his book “Expert Witness Training” was published by Presentation Dynamics. Robbins has advanced degrees from UC Berkeley and the University of Michigan, has been an Information Systems manager and an Education Systems manager, and consults in both computer and legal issues. Learn more about Mr. Robbins and his Expert Witness Training materials at www.juddrobbins.com

This tutorial provides a quick introduction to finding scholarly, peer-reviewed articles using SJSU’s databases. Topics covered include selecting a database, searching on a topic, and accessing the full text of articles.
Video Rating: / 5