Please complete this survey after viewing the video!
Posts Tagged ‘Peer’
Please complete this survey after viewing the video!
This video will show you how to quickly dissect a peer-reviewed scholarly journal article for discussing in a research paper or course discussion board.
database, peer reviewed, peer-reviewed, articles, MEd, education
Video Rating: / 5
Online education articles
The school of Education celebrates four decades of involved teachers, devoted leaders and caring counselors. Our faculty and students are scholars and social.
Thanks for watching my vedio please don’t forgate subscribe our channel.
A quick video for students in the MEd program that demonstrates how to find peer reviewed articles.
In the 1993 Supreme Court case “Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals,” Justice Blackmun said for the unanimous court that an expert’s testimony has to rest on a reliable foundation and has to be relevant to the task at hand. He brought up the key consideration about whether the theory or technique used can be or has been tested and subjected to ‘peer review’ and publication.
Expert witnesses have seen their work rejected and their testimony excluded when they haven’t attended to Daubert standards of peer review.
Identify another specialist in your field that the court can treat as a peer. So if you are a biomedical engineer, another biomedical engineer would be a peer, and so on. Your attorney can retain this person to review your work, specifically your expert report. A peer reviewer would provide his own report of findings regarding the subject matter of your expert report. Yes, this may sound like double work, but an increasingly appropriate and valuable extra step. If another expert independently verifies the validity of your work, it will help to ensure the legal admissibility of that work. In addition, this extra step can bring extra credibility to your work. This will further support the relevancy and reliability of your work, opinion, and testimony.
The peer reviewer should submit his report directly to the law firm that engaged both of you. By and large, your attorney will submit your expert report, along with the peer reviewer’s report and a CV describing the peer reviewer’s background, training, and skills. You should not have any contact with the peer reviewer after the law firm retains him and before he submits his report back to them. Keep the points of this paragraph in mind because, from time to time, you may be hired in a case as a peer reviewer rather than as an expert witness.
Sometimes a peer review is called a third-party review, because the other party may not be a precise peer, but may still be a specialist in a related field of expertise. You should use such a third-party reviewer if part of your testimony includes information that is close to, but not specifically part of, your primary experience.
Judd Robbins has been an internationally recognized expert witness since 1986 in the US and in the UK. In 2010, his book “Expert Witness Training” was published by Presentation Dynamics. Robbins has advanced degrees from UC Berkeley and the University of Michigan, has been an Information Systems manager and an Education Systems manager, and consults in both computer and legal issues. Learn more about Mr. Robbins and his Expert Witness Training materials at www.juddrobbins.com
This tutorial provides a quick introduction to finding scholarly, peer-reviewed articles using SJSU’s databases. Topics covered include selecting a database, searching on a topic, and accessing the full text of articles.
Video Rating: / 5
The accepted route for the dissemination of analysis findings is thru their publication in peer-reviewed analysis articles. this can be a superb system in several regards – alternative researchers within the field are given a chance to assess whether or not the strategies used were applicable, the experiments well-controlled, the interpretation of the results per the info, which the study very adds to this understanding.
But for all its blessings, pre-publication peer-review doesn’t tell us one easy thing: will the experiments be replicated? All too typically, researchers from alternative labs have difficulties replicating revealed findings. Usually, this can be owing to refined variations within the methodology used between labs. Less frequently, the revealed information could have arisen from an honest mistake; a malfunctioning piece of apparatus say, or a forgotten step throughout the statistical analysis. Sadly, there’s a 3rd risk, that despite its rarity, gets all the attention: the spectre of fraud.
Peer-review isn’t a safe-guard against fraud, as exemplified by the appalling case of Diederik Stapel. Currently, one’s scientific productivity is gauged by publication output, and as such, there’s huge pressure to publish work in fine quality journals. One unfortunate consequence of this can be that researchers (and editors) are reluctant to retract revealed work when errors (innocent or otherwise) return to light-weight. The competitive ethos of ‘publish or perish’, combined with the absence of adequate checks and balances, has allowed the foremost corrupt and eager to commit fraudulent acts.
There are alternative issues with this system. Currently, it is many years between a completely unique discovery and its eventual publication, and therefore the vast size of the literature defeats makes an attempt to stay abreast of developments in divergent fields. worry of being ‘scooped’ causes several scientists to become secretive regarding findings, impeding progress.
I propose a radical solution: the whole abolition of analysis papers.
The nature of publication is counter to the terribly concept of science as a method and not a product. an alternate approach may entail the submission of all novel analysis findings to on-line databases, with credit being given to the first contributors – given that alternative establishments are ready to replicate the results. Hence, it might be in everyone’s interest to supply detailed methodology, and support alternative researchers in makes an attempt to copy their work. Unless the work is shown to be reproducible, it might wither and die on the wiki-vine.
Clearly, this doesn’t apply to any or all fields. Not everybody has access to a particle accelerator of the dimensions of the big Hadron Collider, and lots of techniques are highly specialised. In these cases, the researchers would be expected to demonstrate their findings to colleagues among the sector.
In this method, analysis would become a a lot of collaborative effort, and fledging lab heads would be higher ready to compete with their competent peers. Journals would publish periodic review articles primarily based on confirmed findings within the database, written by researchers among every field.
The advantages of such a system are considerable. information would become an open resource, with authors a lot of willing to gift at conferences. Scientists would be rewarded for his or her continual analysis outcome instead of punctuated papers, raising morale, and information reliability would be assured. Finally, shorter author lists would build individual contributions a lot of clear. we have a tendency to should acknowledge an antiquated system for what it’s, and start to implement the mandatory changes.
–Consensus: 99.84% of Peer-Reviewed Articles Support the Idea of Climate Change Cause by human activity.
–On the Bonus Show: Professor caught watching porn in class, lack of sleep turns off genes, felony charge for releasing balloons, more…
If you liked this clip of The David Pakman Show, please do us a big favor and share it with your friends… and hit that “like” button!
Become a Member: http://www.davidpakman.com/membership
Like Us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/davidpakmanshow
Follow Us on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/davidpakmanshow
Get TDPS Gear: http://www.davidpakman.com/gear
24/7 Voicemail Line: (219)-2DAVIDP
Subscribe to The David Pakman Show for more: http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=midweekpolitics
Broadcast on February 27, 2013 Support TDPS by clicking (bookmark it too!) this link before shopping on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/?tag=thedavpaksho-20
Video Rating: / 5
When you think about needing homeschool help, you don’t often think about peer pressure. After all, no peer pressure is one of the perks about teaching your children at home. They don’t have to worry about the class bully. They don’t have to worry about having the coolest, in-style clothes. So why worry about peer pressure?
The peer pressure that I’m talking about is not on your children…it’s on you.
Dealing with Peer Pressure in Homeschooling
You love homeschooling. You love being able to choose the curriculum that best suits your child. You love being able to teach at the speed your child needs – giving extra time for difficult subjects. Everything seems to be going just fine. That is until you have to face one of these scenarios:
Homeschool field trips, co-ops, and activities.
As you’re enjoying your time visiting and sharing with other moms, you begin to pay attention to what other homeschooled children are doing. What level of math are they doing? How well are they reading? What languages are they learning? How well they write, etc., etc., etc.
Instead of feeling relaxed and uplifted from your time visiting, you find yourself stressed out and doubt begins to creep in about your teaching skills.
Planning on having a pleasant Sunday dinner with your parents or in-laws? You thought they were serving grilled chicken — turns out you’re the one being grilled. What curriculum are you using? Do you follow the school schedule? What if Johhny gets behind? What? Suzy isn’t doing Algebra yet! Will they be accepted by colleges? Will they get scholarships?
Standardized tests have always been my downfall. Nothing bothers me like these tests. This seems to be the measure that society grades our children by. Never mind that the school systems have declared these tests worthless for years.
How about the trips to the grocery store? The clerk finds out your child is homeschooled and immediately begins quizzing them about who the 17th President of the United States was. What was his dog’s name? What state was he from? Really…does anyone know this off the top of his or her head?
I’m sure, at one time or another, you’ve faced one of these scenarios. If you’re like me, it left you feeling inadequate, doubtful, and insecure. So what’s the answer to withstanding this type of peer pressure?
Confidence in knowing why you homeschool. Take time to sit down and think about this.
Do you homeschool to build character in your children?
Do you homeschool to avoid public school socialization?
Do you homeschool because your child has learning disabilities and you can give individualized attention to her at home?
Do you homeschool for religious beliefs?
Take some time. Remind yourself why it is that you home school and build your strength upon this. I personally homeschool my children because the Lord lead me to do this. Any time I feel peer pressure or feel like giving up, I draw upon my faith and obedience to God to keep me going.
Those standardized tests? They don’t bother me anymore. I have faith that the Lord will give me guidance to prepare my children for the work he has set aside for them to do. Have confidence in knowing that God gave your children to you to raise and He will give you the help and guidance you need to accomplish the job.
For more homeschool help visit http://www.Home-Schooling-Haven.com and get advice and helpful information from a homeschool mom with 16 years of experience.